Splendid anniversary of the 30 years of very truitful activity of the commission of maritime law of the polish academy of sciences. Gdañsk Branch.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Durante los 30 anos de actividad de la Comision de Derecho Maritimo polaco se publicaron 30 volumenes de su anuario cientifico Prawo Morskie (Derecho maritimo), unica revista de ese ambito en Polonia, que recogen mas de 170 articulos de gran utilidad teorico-practica para legislar. En el volumen 27 (2011) se han publicado estudios y articulos entre los que destacan algunas enmiendas del Codigo Maritimo polaco de 2001, el conflicto de legislacion en el derecho internacional del transporte maritimo, la vigilancia maritima en la ley maritima integrada y la politica pesquera de la Union Europea, la proteccion del medio maritimo, etc. Tambien sobre el Mar Baltico, que fue objeto de disputas de zonas y ambitos tanto entre Polonia y Dinamarca como entre Polonia y Alemania en sus relaciones maritimas. Ademas vieron la luz trabajos sobre la co-dependencia entre los reglamentos nauticos y de navegacion aeronautica en el derecho y la politica internacional o la controversia del pasaje del Artico en las relaciones entre Canada y Estados Unidos.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.038 | 0.018 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".