MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1560172252

Splendid anniversary of the 30 years of very truitful activity of the commission of maritime law of the polish academy of sciences. Gdañsk Branch.

2013· article· es· W1560172252 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Leonard Łukaszuk

Bibliographic record

VenueRevista europea de derecho de la navegación marítima y aeronáutica/Revista europea de derecho de la navegación marítima y aeronáutica · 2013
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicInternational Maritime Law Issues
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPhilosophyPolitical science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Durante los 30 anos de actividad de la Comision de Derecho Maritimo polaco se publicaron 30 volumenes de su anuario cientifico Prawo Morskie (Derecho maritimo), unica revista de ese ambito en Polonia, que recogen mas de 170 articulos de gran utilidad teorico-practica para legislar. En el volumen 27 (2011) se han publicado estudios y articulos entre los que destacan algunas enmiendas del Codigo Maritimo polaco de 2001, el conflicto de legislacion en el derecho internacional del transporte maritimo, la vigilancia maritima en la ley maritima integrada y la politica pesquera de la Union Europea, la proteccion del medio maritimo, etc. Tambien sobre el Mar Baltico, que fue objeto de disputas de zonas y ambitos tanto entre Polonia y Dinamarca como entre Polonia y Alemania en sus relaciones maritimas. Ademas vieron la luz trabajos sobre la co-dependencia entre los reglamentos nauticos y de navegacion aeronautica en el derecho y la politica internacional o la controversia del pasaje del Artico en las relaciones entre Canada y Estados Unidos.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Open science, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.618
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.014
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0070.005
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevista europea de derecho de la navegación marítima y aeronáutica/Revista europea de derecho de la navegación marítima y aeronáuticaSame topicInternational Maritime Law IssuesFrench-language works237,207