MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Discrepancy between clinical and pathological stage: external validation of the impact on prognosis in an international radical cystectomy cohort

2011· article· en· W1560239325 on OpenAlexaff
Robert S. Svatek, Shahrokh F. Shariat, Giacomo Novara, Eila C. Skinner, Yves Fradet, Patrick J. Bastian, Ashish M. Kamat, Wassim Kassouf, Pierre I. Karakiewicz, Hans‐Martin Fritsche, Jonathan I. Izawa, Derya Tilki, Vincenzo Ficarra, Bjoern G. Volkmer, Hendrik Isbarn, Colin P. Dinney

Bibliographic record

VenueBritish Journal of Urology · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments
Canadian institutionsWestern UniversityUniversité de MontréalMcGill University Health CentreUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCystectomyMedicineStage (stratigraphy)CohortPathological stagingBladder cancerPathologicalLymphadenectomySurgeryRetrospective cohort studyUrologyCancerInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Study Type – Prognosis (case series) Level of Evidence 4 What’s known on the subject? and What does the study add? Observations from small retrospective studies have indicated that a considerable number of patients undergoing radical cystectomy for bladder cancer experience a stage migration (either upstaging or downstaging) when comparing clinical and pathological staging. In addition, it is unclear if pathological upstaging is an adverse prognostic feature independent of pathological stage. We report the frequency of upstaging and downstaging using a large, international multicentre cohort of patients undergoing radical cystectomy for bladder cancer without neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Our findings indicate that pathological upstaging is not an independent adverse prognostic feature when considering pathological stage. OBJECTIVE • To compare the clinical and pathologic stage among a large, multi‐institutional series of patients undergoing radical and to determine the effect of stage discrepancy on outcomes. PATIENTS AND METHODS • Data was collected from nine centers and 3,393 patients with urothelial carcinoma of the bladder (UCB) treated with radical cystectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy without neo‐adjuvant chemotherapy. • A retrospective cohort design was used to assess the percentage of patients experiencing stage discrepancy and the impact of stage discrepancy on time to disease relapse and time to death from UCB. RESULTS • Clinical under staging occurred in 50% of patients and pathologic down staging occurred in 18% of patients. • Up staging to muscle invasive disease occurred in 45.9% (n = 592) of 1,291 patients with clinical ≤T1, including 30.6% of patients with Tis only at transurethral resection. • Of the 3,166 patients with clinically organ confined (OC) tumor stage, 1,357 (42.9%) were up staged to non‐organ confined pathologic tumor stage. • Within each clinical stage stratum, patients who were clinically under staged had a higher probability of disease relapse or death from UCB compared to those who were same staged or down staged on pathologic examination ( P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS • We identified clinical under staging in half of the patients undergoing radical cystectomy for UCB. • Up staging resulted in a higher likelihood of disease progression and eventual death from UCB. • These findings should be considered when utilizing pre‐operative risk‐adapted strategies for selecting candidates for neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.023
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.065
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.023
Threshold uncertainty score0.123

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0230.065
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.056
GPT teacher head0.365
Teacher spread0.309 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations218
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBritish Journal of UrologySame topicBladder and Urothelial Cancer TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207