MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1560299250

Arbeitslosigkeit und Gesundheit: ein Überblick über empirische Befunde und die Arbeitslosen- und Krankenkassenstatistik (Unemployment and health: an overview of empirical findings and the unemployment and health insurance statistics)

2005· article· de· W1560299250 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Alfons Hollederer

Bibliographic record

VenueMitteilungen aus der Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung · 2005
Typearticle
Languagede
FieldHealth Professions
TopicEmployment and Welfare Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsUnemploymentMental healthQuarter (Canadian coin)Demographic economicsPsychologyActuarial scienceEconomicsPsychiatryGeographyEconomic growth
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

"Compared with the employed, unemployed people show a clearly poorer health condition. This is substantiated by representative surveys and by the statistics of the health insurance companies in Germany. International meta-analyses show that long-lasting unemployment does not only correlate with mental illnesses but can also cause or aggravate them. In the official unemployment statistics about a quarter of the unemployed have health-related problems that affect placement. In the routine report procedures of the medical service of the Federal Employment Service (Bundesanstalt für Arbeit) in 2001 'mental illnesses and behavioural disorders' were diagnosed the most frequently after 'illnesses of the muscular-skeletal system'. However, the proportion of unemployed people with health problems is systematically underestimated in the unemployment statistics. As a result of the outflows of unemployed people who are unfit for work and other special groups from the stock, selection effects and artefacts occur in the statistics. In 2001 approximately 76,000 recipients of unemployment benefit or unemployment assistance who were unable to work for health reasons were not counted in the annual average. As a result of the remarks made by the placement officers in the applicant offers, social-medical reports and certificates of incapacity for work, health-related data are available for a large number of unemployed people. The information remains fragmentary, however, and the sources of data are not linked. At the same time unemployed people are taken insufficiently into account in the health reports of the individual health insurance companies and in the national statistics covering all types of health insurance. In addition to this, unemployed people are neglected as a target group for prevention and health promotion. A vicious circle is beginning to emerge for unemployed individuals with health problems, as they have poorer chances of being reintegrated into the labour market and are in greater danger of becoming long-term unemployed. It is therefore essential to develop approaches to health promotion that take the labour market into account. By intensifying the prevention idea in the catalogue of tasks of the health insurance companies and by introducing 'profiling' and 'case management' in the Job-AQTIV law, new opportunities could arise for unemployed people with health problems." (Author's abstract, IAB-Doku) ((en))

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.044
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.075
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.044
Threshold uncertainty score0.231

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0440.075
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.003
Bibliometrics0.0080.010
Science and technology studies0.0010.005
Scholarly communication0.0080.009
Open science0.0020.004
Research integrity0.0030.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.144
GPT teacher head0.467
Teacher spread0.323 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMitteilungen aus der Arbeitsmarkt- und BerufsforschungSame topicEmployment and Welfare StudiesFrench-language works237,207