MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1560346632

"To Make a Show of Concealing": The Revision of Satire in Earle Birney’s "Bushed"

2010· article· en· W1560346632 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Duncan McFarlane

Bibliographic record

VenueStudies in Canadian Literature · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTragedy (event)IronyCriticismLiteraturePoetryPhilosophyArtHistory
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

From its first draft – which has never before been analyzed – to its final version, Earle Birney’s celebrated poem “Bushed” moves between the two extremes that Northrop Frye suggests are central themes in Canadian poetry: satire and tragedy. Although critics frequently label Birney a satirist, and the first draft of “Bushed” is clearly satirical, the final version published in Trial of a City and Other Verse (1952) has more in common with tragedy. Birney’s extensive revisions to “Bushed” are illuminated in light of his condemnatory view of satire as the adolescence of irony, most clearly expressed in his criticism on Chaucer. Revealing Birney’s highly negative attitude toward satire may help resolve a peculiar pattern in Birney criticism wherein he is celebrated as a satirist even as the quality of his satires is questioned.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.865
Threshold uncertainty score0.304

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.307
Teacher spread0.290 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2010
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueStudies in Canadian LiteratureSame topicCanadian Identity and HistoryFrench-language works237,207