Le confucianisme de la « Voie royale », direction pour le politique en Chine contemporaine
Bibliographic record
Abstract
À travers ses différentes acceptions, la démocratie est devenue en Chine contemporaine l’horizon indépassable du politique. Pourtant, pour la tradition politique confucéenne dite de la « Voie royale », le peuple n’a jamais constitué qu’une source de légitimité du politique, à égalité avec le Ciel (c’est-à-dire un ordre supérieur et transcendant) et la Terre (c’est-à-dire l’histoire et la culture). L’auteur souligne qu’il importe aujourd’hui de rétablir cet équilibre pour permettre à la Chine de sortir de l’ornière dans laquelle elle est enfoncée depuis plus d’un siècle. Il accompagne sa réflexion sur le politique de propositions institutionnelles à travers lesquelles un nouvel équilibre des types de légitimité pourrait selon lui trouver une traduction concrète.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.027 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".