MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1560410524 · doi:10.1109/isbi.2015.7163805

Automatic assessment of developmental dysplasia of the hip

2015· article· en· W1560410524 on OpenAlexaff
Niamul Quader, Antony J. Hodgson, Kishore Mulpuri, Thomas Savage, Rafeef Abugharbieh

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHip disorders and treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsUltrasoundMedicineMedical diagnosisDysplasiaFemoral headRadiologyHip dysplasiaPediatricsSurgeryRadiographyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) refers to a spectrum of hip joint abnormalities that may lead to significant adverse consequences if not detected and treated early in infancy. Clinical exam with selective ultrasound (US) imaging is the current standard used for early detection and diagnosis of DDH in infants up to 6 months of age. However, current US systems require specialized training and have considerable between-center variability, which raises concerns of missed early diagnoses and subsequent complications from late treatment. We propose a novel, automatic, and near real-time image analysis approach that extracts bone contours in US images of the neonatal hip and calculates image based dysplasia metrics (alpha and beta angles). We present quantitative validation on 54 US scans of femoral head flexion collected from 10 infants under age of 3 months.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.320
Teacher spread0.288 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicHip disorders and treatmentsFrench-language works237,207