MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1560581193 · doi:10.1002/pat.3322

Microinjection molding of polyamide 6

2014· article· en· W1560581193 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenuePolymers for Advanced Technologies · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicInjection Molding Process and Properties
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersRyerson UniversityUniversidade de Aveiro
KeywordsMicroinjectionPolyamideMaterials scienceDifferential scanning calorimetryCrystallinityExtrusionMolding (decorative)Composite materialPolarized light microscopyMicrostructurePolymerOptical microscopeScanning electron microscopeOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Processing polymers by microinjection molding (μIM) generate specific constraints upon the polymer melt such as high shear stress and rapid cooling, leaving a mark upon the microstructure of the micropart. The present work compares the morphology and structure of polyamide 6 samples produced by melt extrusion and μIM. The specimens obtained were analyzed by polarized light microscopy, differential scanning calorimetry, and wide-angle X-ray diffraction. α and γ crystalline forms were formed in polyamide 6 samples prepared by both methods. The γ form was dominant in the skin of the microinjection molded part, with larger contribution for these samples compared with extruded samples. The conditions used in μIM lead to considerable orientation at the skin region, decreasing toward the core, while the extruded samples showed almost no orientation. The overall degree of crystallinity of the microinjection molded part was lower compared with the extruded sample. Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.529
Threshold uncertainty score0.435

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.202
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it