MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1560622535

On Orientation of Contemporary Value of Design Logic About Urban Residential Space in China

2015· article· en· W1560622535 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Yue Qiu

Bibliographic record

VenueCross-cultural communication · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicUrban Design and Spatial Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChinaSpace (punctuation)DeterminismValue (mathematics)Perspective (graphical)Architectural engineeringSociologyUrban designNarrativeAestheticsComputer scienceEpistemologyUrban planningPolitical scienceCivil engineeringEngineeringArtificial intelligenceLawPhilosophy
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Contemporary design logic of urban residential space should reveal not only relationship between human being and the specific materials or events around resident behavior which is maybe obvious or hidden, but also business value in the market operation. This paper analyzes ways of the organization of functions to provide effective services and landscape narrative in the design of contemporary urban residential space in China, viewing from the perspective of “reasonable theory”, “economics” and “design aesthetic”, based by relevant cases. At last, we can put forward the determinism of scarce resources in contemporary logic of urban resident space design.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.343
Threshold uncertainty score0.399

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.300
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCross-cultural communicationSame topicUrban Design and Spatial AnalysisFrench-language works237,207