MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1560771296

La gestión del agua en México

2010· article· es· W1560771296 on OpenAlex
Louise Rolland, Yenny Vega Cárdenas

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueDialnet (Universidad de la Rioja) · 2010
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMexican Socioeconomic and Environmental Dynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical scienceHumanitiesGeographyPhilosophy
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

At the beginning of the present millennium, the Mexican government declared water issues as an issue of national interest. In absolute terms, though, the country is not in lack of water; rather, it is the inequality in the distribution of the resource over the territory, it's pollution and lack of hydraulic infrastructure maintenance that are responsible for this shortage. The authors propose to view this situation through the influence that the socioeconomic context of the country and its level of international dependence had on the public policy elaboration and the adoption of governance models. Traditionally, water was considered as a common good, its management was entrusted for a long time to public agencies responsible of overseeing for general interest. However, since 1992, new governance models based on administrative decentralization, decision-making democratization, but also resource privatization, were incited by the economic international organizations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.135
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.206
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it