MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1560797838 · doi:10.22146/jmh.16269

Sunset Policy dan Implikasinya terhadap Peningkatan Penerimaan Pajak Penghasilan di Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta

2012· article· en· W1560797838 on OpenAlexaff
Dahliana Hasan

Bibliographic record

VenueMimbar Hukum - Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicTaxation and Compliance Studies
Canadian institutionsEncana (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTaxpayerSunsetPaymentRevenueTax policyMeaning (existential)Income taxFaithPolitical scienceEconomicsBusinessLawAccountingFinanceTax reformTheologyPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Sunset policy is a policy which decreases the amount of administrative sanction in the form of interest. This policy is governed by Article 37A Act Number 28 of 2007. The target of sunset policy is the taxpayer who has good faith either to admit having insufficient payment of income tax or to have willed to register a tax file number (NPWP). However, the time of sunset policy is limited; it takes only 1 (one) year to apply the policy from 1 January to 31 December 2008. The research found that first, in tax law side sunset policy has the same legal meaning as kwijtschelding. The same legal meaning refers to the same characteristics found both in sunset policy and in kwijtschelding. Second, the internal target was not achieved until November 2008 as a result there was less contribution to the increasing amount of income tax revenue in DIY.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.024
Threshold uncertainty score0.079

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0240.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMimbar Hukum - Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah MadaSame topicTaxation and Compliance StudiesFrench-language works237,207