MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1560801891 · doi:10.1109/pes.2004.1373171

Power quality control of hybrid wind power generation with battery storage using fuzzy-LQR controller

2004· article· en· W1560801891 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Power Engineering Society General Meeting, 2004. · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFrequency Control in Power Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsControl theory (sociology)Linear-quadratic regulatorController (irrigation)Fuzzy logicFuzzy control systemWind powerControl engineeringComputer sciencePower (physics)PID controllerEngineeringControl (management)Temperature control

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This work presents a modeling and control design for a wind-hybrid power system with a battery storage. The proposed control scheme is based on the Takagi-Sugeno fuzzy model and the linear quadratic regulator. The Takagi-Sugeno fuzzy model expresses the local dynamics of a nonlinear system through subsystems partitioned by linguistic rules. The controllers for each subsystem are designed by the linear quadratic regulator. In the simulation study, the proposed controller is compared with the proportional-integral (PI) controller. The simulation results show that the proposed controller is more effective than the PI controller against disturbances caused by wind speed and load variation. Thus, better quality of the wind-hybrid power system is achieved.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.345
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it