MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1560832039 · doi:10.5772/31486

Alterations in Expression and Function of Phosphodiesterases in Huntington’s Disease

2012· book-chapter· en· W1560832039 on OpenAlexafffund
Robert B. Laprairie, Greg Hosier, Matthew Hogel, M. Eileen

Bibliographic record

VenueInTech eBooks · 2012
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicPhosphodiesterase function and regulation
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
FundersNova Scotia Health Research Foundation
KeywordsPhosphodiesteraseGene isoformPDE10AGuanosine monophosphateGeneCyclic guanosine monophosphateCyclic nucleotideNucleotideCyclic adenosine monophosphateGuanosineRNA splicingADCY3Cyclic nucleotide phosphodiesteraseAlternative splicingBiologyBiochemistryEnzymeProtein kinase AcAMP-dependent pathwayEndocrinologyReceptorRNA

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cyclic AMP (cAMP, cyclic 3’, 5’-adenosine monophosphate) was first identified as a signalling molecule in 1958 (Rall & Sutherland, 1958), however it was not until 1962 that the enzyme responsible for hydrolysis of cAMP was identified and named phosphodiesterase (PDE; Butcher & Sutherland, 1962). Shortly afterwards, cyclic GMP (cGMP, cyclic 3’, 5’-guanosine monophosphate) was identified as another important second messenger that was hydrolyzed by PDE (Ashman et al., 1963). PDEs inactivate cAMP or cGMP by hydrolizing the 3’ cyclic phosphate bond of the cyclic nucleotide in question (Bender & Beavo 2006). Through molecular cloning and sequencing, it is now known that mammalian PDEs are encoded by 21 distinct genes (Bender & Beavo, 2006). These 21 genes encode protein isoforms of which variants can exist through the use of multiple transcription start sites and alternative mRNA splicing (Bender & Beavo, 2006). The 21 identified isoforms have been grouped into 11 families based on similarities in amino acid sequence, structure and function.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.096
Threshold uncertainty score0.771

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2012
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInTech eBooksSame topicPhosphodiesterase function and regulationFrench-language works237,207