MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1561044346 · doi:10.4000/cdlm.6686

Mémoires de voyage dans l’aire méditerranéenne au xvie siècle

2012· article· fr· W1561044346 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Claudia Pancino

Bibliographic record

VenueCahiers de la Méditerranée · 2012
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicTravel Writing and Literature
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtHumanities

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cette lecture de Léon l’Africain. Un voyageur entre deux mondes de Natalie Zemon Davis privilégie l’aspect de la recherche, et de la narration, qui rapporte des tableaux de culture du sud de la Méditerranée, au début de l’âge moderne, avec des panoramas provenant de la côte nord. Le défi consiste à considérer la Méditerranée du xviesiècle en tant que centre de beaucoup de questions à démêler. Mais surtout, on souligne que le personnage de Léon l’Africain –Yuhanna al-Asad, ou Hasan al-Wazzan– originaire de Grenade, musulman, diplomate à la cour de Fès, capturé en 1518 lors d’un voyage sur un bateau le long de la côte nord-africaine, qui vécut à Rome et voyagea en Europe puis en Afrique, a représenté pour Natalie Zemon Davis le témoignage de la possibilité d’une identité méditerranéenne qu’on peut nommer pré-moderne (ou bien pré-tridentine). La méthode d’écriture des mémoires de voyage de Léon au xviesiècle, comme du livre de l’historienne canadienne au xxie, se caractérise par le respect, la compréhension, l’observation, la tolérance et ce que l’on appelle aujourd’hui l’« interculturel ».

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.025

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0040.003
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCahiers de la MéditerranéeSame topicTravel Writing and LiteratureFrench-language works237,207