Bibliographic record
Abstract
La langue tchouktche appartient à la même famille linguistique que les dialectes koriaks. De nos jours le processus d’extinction de la langue parlée paraît irréversible alors que vers 1950 les Tchouktches parlaient encore tous leur langue. Le lexique révèle une grande variété, particulièrement en ce qui concerne l’espace et le temps, la toundra, la mer, les phénomènes naturels, les coutumes. Plus de 320 mots désignent le renne. Des éléments du lexique sont communs à la langue des Tchouktches et à celle des Yupiget de Sibérie, de même que certains traits de langue. La langue tchouktche est beaucoup plus variée dans le domaine de la morphologie et de la syntaxe que ne le laissent supposer les descriptions faites à ce jour. Le fonctionnement de la langue est marqué notamment par les phénomènes de l’harmonie vocalique, l’existence de parlers masculin et féminin, le rôle important de l’affixation, l’emploi fréquent de verbes auxiliaires dans la phrase, l’existence de nombreux gérondifs et leur usage dans la prédication, la large polyvalence des temps du verbe et des cas de la flexion nominale.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.025 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".