MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1561182462 · doi:10.1109/csb.2003.1227408

GenericBioMatch: A novel generic pattern match algorithm for biological sequences

2004· article· en· W1561182462 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAlgorithms and Data Compression
Canadian institutionsNational Research Council Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceAlgorithmProbabilistic logicJavaOverhead (engineering)Probabilistic analysis of algorithmsDNA sequencingSoftwareBiological dataGenomicsTheoretical computer scienceBioinformaticsDNAArtificial intelligenceBiologyGeneticsProgramming languageGenome

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

GenericBioMatch is a novel algorithm for exact match in biological sequences. It allows the sequence motif pattern to contain one or more wild card letters (eg. Y, R, W in DNA sequences) and one or more gaps of any number of bases. GenericBioMatch is a relatively fast algorithm as compared to probabilistic algorithms, and has very little computational overhead. It is able to perform exact match of protein motifs as well as DNA motifs. This algorithm can serve as a quick validation tool for implementation of other algorithms, and can also serve as a supporting tool for probabilistic algorithms in order to reduce computational overhead. This algorithm has been implemented in the BioMiner software (http://iit-iti.nrc-cnrc.gc.ca/biomine e.trx), a suite of Java tools for integrated data mining in genomics. It has been tested successfully with DNA sequences from human, yeast, and Arabidopsis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.965
Threshold uncertainty score0.502

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.059
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAlgorithms and Data CompressionFrench-language works237,207