MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W1561374028 · doi:10.1002/9781444391374.ch32

Future Directions in Diabetes Management and Research

2010· other· en· W1561374028 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Rudy Bilous, Richard Donnelly

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typeother
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPancreatic function and diabetes
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDiabetes mellitusIsletInsulinTransplantationStem cellPancreasMedicineHaematopoiesisClinical trialType 1 diabetesInternal medicineType 2 diabetesBioinformaticsPancreas transplantationDiabetes managementIntensive care medicineEndocrinologyBiologyCell biology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Whole-organ pancreas transplantation still offers the most consistent method of achieving long-term normoglycaemia in type 1 diabetes. The initially very positive clinical outcome of islet cell transplantation using the Edmonton protocol has not been reproduced in multicentre trials, with only 44% insulin independent at 1 year and 23% at 3 years. Closed loop infusion pumps are under trial but have problems with time lag sensing of blood glucose levels and trends. Insulin-producing cells have been derived from stem cells obtained from a variety of tissues and been shown to function in animals. To date, only one trial in human diabetes has been reported using haematopoietic stem cells with some success but with significant complications. Reprogramming cells to produce insulin using gene therapy has yet to be proven in human diabetes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.010
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.056
Threshold uncertainty score0.186

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0100.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0050.006
Open science0.0030.002
Research integrity0.0070.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0560.012

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.310
Teacher spread0.290 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPancreatic function and diabetes→French-language works237,207→