MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1561568744

Normative threshold levels for a calibrated, computer-assisted version of the ling six-sound test

2005· article· en· W1561568744 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Julianne J. Tenhaaf, Susan Scollie

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian acoustics · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSpeech and Audio Processing
Canadian institutionsWestern UniversityBrock University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCalibrationSound (geography)AudiometryTest (biology)AudiologyAcousticsNormativeSpeech recognitionComputer scienceMathematicsStatisticsHearing lossMedicinePhysics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The designing and calibration of Ling Six-Sound Test with principles of sound field audiometry was carried out to establish normative data on ten normal-hearing adults. The Ling Six phonemic stimuli were used to test auditory detection levels. The calibration on all stimuli was completed using concatenated sound files played at 70 dB HL through one speaker of a five-speaker array. The results show that the SPL values yields the frequency distribution of each phoneme and a-weighted levels in dB SPL.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.773
Threshold uncertainty score0.392

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2005
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian acousticsSame topicSpeech and Audio ProcessingFrench-language works237,207