MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1561718880 · doi:10.1038/lsa.2015.71

Complete temporal characterization of a single photon

2015· article· en· W1561718880 on OpenAlexafffundabout

Bibliographic record

VenueLight Science & Applications · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicQuantum Information and Cryptography
Canadian institutionsCanadian Institute for Advanced ResearchUniversity of Calgary
FundersChina Scholarship CouncilNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanadian Institute for Advanced Research
KeywordsLocal oscillatorPhotonHomodyne detectionAutocorrelationHeterodyne (poetry)Direct-conversion receiverHeterodyne detectionDetectorPhoton countingQuantum information science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Precise information about the temporal mode of optical states is crucial for optimizing their interaction efficiency between themselves and/or with matter in various quantum communication devices. Here we propose and experimentally demonstrate a method of determining both the real and imaginary components of a single photon's temporal density matrix by measuring the autocorrelation function of the photocurrent from a balanced homodyne detector at multiple local oscillator frequencies. We test our method on single photons heralded from biphotons generated via four-wave mixing in an atomic vapor and obtain excellent agreement with theoretical predictions for several settings. A convenient scheme for characterizing the temporal properties of a single photon looks set to aid experiments in quantum optics. An international team of scientists from Canada, China, USA, Uruguay and Russia says that this approach can be used to determine the complete mode structure of a photon, in particular, the real and imaginary parts of its temporal density matrix. This information is important for quantum communication experiments for which it is often critical to match photon modes. The characterization scheme, which the researchers term polychromatic optical heterodyne tomography, works by collecting autocorrelation data of homodyne photocurrent at multiple local oscillator frequencies. The team says that tests of the technique with single photons generated by four-wave mixing in an atomic vapour agree well with theoretical predictions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations63
Published2015
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLight Science & ApplicationsSame topicQuantum Information and CryptographyFrench-language works237,207