MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

The ABC transporter Pdr5p mediates the efflux of nonsteroidal ecdysone agonists in <i>Saccharomyces cerevisiae</i>

2001· article· en· W1561924369 on OpenAlexaff
Wenqi Hu, Qili Feng, Subba Reddy Palli, Peter J. Krell, Basil M. Arif, Arthur Retnakaran

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Journal of Biochemistry · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicInsect and Pesticide Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of GuelphCanadian Forest Service
Fundersnot available
KeywordsATP-binding cassette transporterEffluxTransporterMutantBiologySaccharomyces cerevisiaeBiochemistryYeastGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We have previously shown that the synthetic nonsteroidal ecdysone agonist tebufenozide (RH-5992) is actively excluded by resistant cells of insects. To identify the transporter that could be involved in the efflux of RH-5992, the role of three ATP binding cassette transporters, Pdr5p, Snq2p and Ycf1p, has been studied using transporter-deletion mutants of yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. PDR5 (pleiotropic drug resistance 5) deletion mutants (Deltapdr5 and Deltapdr5Deltasnq2) retained significantly higher levels of 14C-radiolabeled RH-5992 within the cells when compared to wild-type strain or single deletion mutants of SNQ2 (Deltasnq2) and YCF1 (Deltaycf1). Introduction of an expression vector containing the PDR5 gene into the PDR5 single deletion mutant reversed the effect, resulting in the active exclusion of [14C]RH-5992 from these cells as efficiently as the wild-type cells. These results demonstrated that the ABC transporter Pdr5p but not Snq2p or Ycf1p was responsible for the active exclusion of [14C]RH-5992 in yeast. This exclusion was temperature-dependent and was blocked by the ATPase inhibitors oligomycin and vanadate, indicating that the efflux was an active process. The mutants with the PDR5 deletion can also selectively accumulate [14C]RH-0345 and [14C]RH-2485, but not [14C]RH-5849, indicating that these three compounds share the same transporter Pdr5p for efflux.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.458
Threshold uncertainty score0.283

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Journal of BiochemistrySame topicInsect and Pesticide ResearchFrench-language works237,207