MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1561966638 · doi:10.1002/9780470570517.ch7

Topology Control in Sensor, Actuator, and Mobile Robot Networks

2010· other· en· W1561966638 on OpenAlexaff
Arnaud Casteigts, Amiya Nayak, Ivan Stojmenović

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typeother
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicEnergy Efficient Wireless Sensor Networks
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWireless sensor networkTopology controlComputer scienceTopology (electrical circuits)RobotEnhanced Data Rates for GSM EvolutionMobile robotTree (set theory)Distributed computingComputer networkControl (management)Transmission (telecommunications)ActuatorWireless networkWirelessKey distribution in wireless sensor networksMathematicsArtificial intelligenceTelecommunicationsCombinatorics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The chapter starts with a discussion on the main general approaches used to control the connectivity in static sensor networks. The emphasis is put in particular on the problem of finding minimum transmission radii so that the network is connected. This problem is actually closely related to the problem of finding a minimum spanning tree (MST), since the longest edge of such structure corresponds to the minimal common radius achieving the connectivity. The second part of the chapter is concerned with problems related to biconnectivity. The question of detecting local critical nodes and links in a distributed fashion is first covered. It then discusses several scenarios involving biconnectivity of mobile robots. The first two scenarios address the problem of deploying biconnected sensors around a given point of interest (POI), whereas the two last scenarios address the problem of biconnecting a network that is initially 1-connected. Controlled Vocabulary Terms wireless sensor networks

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.644
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.210
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicEnergy Efficient Wireless Sensor NetworksFrench-language works237,207