The transbilayer distribution of phospholipids in disc membranes is a dynamic equilibrium
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We studied the transbilayer redistribution of phospholipids in bovine rod outer segment membranes on thoroughly washed, Ficoll-floated osmotically intact disc vesicles; freshly prepared membranes separated from the disc stack by osmotic shock; and intact disc stacks with a permeabilized plasma membrane (A-discs, B-discs C-discs, respectively). In all cases, spin-labelled phospholipid analogues (SL-PL) with choline, serine and ethanolamine head groups (PtdCho, PtdSer and PtdEtn, respectively) were taken up into the outer leaflet of the membranes by > 90% and within less than 30 s after SL-PL addition, as deduced from the disappearance of spin-label from the suspension medium and from the specific ESR spectrum of membrane-associated spin-label. Using BSA extraction, the amount of SL-PL in the outer leaflet of the bilayer was determined. It decreased with a mean half-time of < 5 min at 25 degrees C, indicating rapid redistribution of all spin-labelled phospholipids into the inner leaflet of the disc membranes. After 1 h, PtdCho and PtdEtn were distributed almost symmetrically, whereas PtdSer was 35 : 65% (in/out). Using subsequent incubation with BSA, the outward movement (flop) of the analogues was observed directly, demonstrating that inward and outward movements proceed in thermodynamic equilibrium. No effect of N-ethylmaleimide or ATP on the redistribution could be measured, which makes it unlikely that energy-consuming translocase or flippase processes are involved in the redistribution in the dark. We reason that the solubilization zone around the photoreceptor rhodopsin may be the locus of rapid redistribution of the highly unsaturated disc phospholipid.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".