MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W1562016711

Abstract 17020: Molecular Spect Imaging of Early Angioproliferative Group I Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension Using an Adrenomedullin Receptor Ligand

2014· article· en· W1562016711 on OpenAlexaff
Nassiba Merabet, Quang T. Nguyen, Sophie Marcil, Bernard Meloche, Yan Shi, Jean‐Claude Tardif, François Harel, Jocelyn Dupuis

Bibliographic record

VenueCirculation · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPulmonary Hypertension Research and Treatments
Canadian institutionsMontreal Heart Institute
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineAdrenomedullinInternal medicineCardiologyPulmonary hypertensionVasodilationLungHypoxia (environmental)EndocrinologyReceptor
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: The main limitation in the development of drugs against pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is the absence of a non-invasive and early marker of disease. Adrenomedullin (AM) is a vasodilator peptide predominantly cleared by pulmonary endothelial receptors. Hypothesis: Our lab has developed Pulmobind PB, an AM derivative radiolabeled with 99mTc for SPECT imaging of pulmonary circulation to detect non-invasively the anomalies of pulmonary circulation caused by PAH. Methods: An angioproliferative model of group I PAH was used. After a single subcutaneous injection of the vascular endothelial growth factor receptor blocker Sugen (20 mg/kg), rats were exposed to hypoxia for 3 weeks followed by normoxia for 4 weeks. PAH rats were compared to their littermate controls (normoxia for 7 weeks). After 7 weeks, Right ventricular (RV) structure, function and hypertrophy as well as lung 99mTc-PB uptake kinetics were assessed by echocardiography and SPECT analyses. Results: RV end-diastolic anterior ...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCirculation→Same topicPulmonary Hypertension Research and Treatments→French-language works237,207→