MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1562027300 · doi:10.1158/1538-7445.am2014-4149

Abstract 4149: Genetic variation in CYP2A6, a nicotine/nitrosamine metabolism enzyme, influences lung cancer risk in two independent case-control studies of African American smokers

2014· article· en· W1562027300 on OpenAlexaff
Catherine A. Wassenaar, Yuanqing Ye, Qiuyin Cai, Melinda C. Aldrich, Jo Knight, Margaret R. Spitz, Xifeng Wu, William J. Blot, Rachel F. Tyndale

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGlutathione Transferases and Polymorphisms
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLung cancerCYP2A6MedicineOdds ratioInternal medicineCase-control studyOncologyPopulationNested case-control studyCancerGenotypeLung cancer susceptibilityNicotineConfidence intervalPhysiologySingle-nucleotide polymorphismGeneticsBiologyEnvironmental healthMetabolismCytochrome P450Gene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract We investigated the association of CYP2A6 genotype with lung cancer risk among African American smokers to further our understanding of cancer susceptibility within this high-risk population. CYP2A6 gene variants are hypothesized to modify lung cancer risk among cigarette smokers by influencing smoking amount, through altered nicotine inactivation, and/or by influencing the bioactivation of carcinogenic tobacco-specific nitrosamines. Participants were African American smokers drawn from two independent lung cancer case-control studies: a study nested within the Southern Community Cohort Study, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN with 1-2 controls matched to each incident lung cancer case by age, sex and recruitment site (SCCS: n = 494), and a case-control study from the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX with controls frequency matched to cases by smoking history in addition to age and sex (MDA: n = 407). Genotyping was performed for 12 CYP2A6 reduced/null activity alleles, and participants with genotypes associated with a 25% or more reduction in CYP2A6 activity were pooled together as reduced metabolizers. Lung cancer risk was estimated through logistic regression modeling, which permitted adjustments for smoking. Compared to the CYP2A6 normal metabolism genotype group, the reduced metabolism group was associated with a significant reduction in lung cancer risk in SCCS, MDA, and in the pooled studies (SCCS: Odds ratio [OR] 0.62, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.43-0.90; MDA: OR 0.66, 95% CI 0.44-0.98; Pooled: OR 0.64, 95% CI 0.49-0.84; ORs adjusted for age and sex). The association remained significant following additional adjustments for cigarettes/day and years of smoking (SCCS: OR 0.58, 95% CI 0.39-0.87; MDA: OR 0.66, 95% CI 0.44-0.99; Pooled: OR 0.62, 95% CI 0.47-0.83). Stratified analyses within the pooled studies revealed a consistent degree of CYP2A6 genetic risk across categories of cigarettes/day (≤10 cig/day: OR 0.65, 95% CI 0.43-0.98; 11-20 cig/day: OR 0.58, 95% CI 0.37-0.91; >20 cig/day: OR 0.64, 95% CI 0.29-1.44) and further assessment of CYP2A6 genotype and lung cancer risk according to smoking duration and current/former smoking status is ongoing. We also noted a significant interaction between CYP2A6 genotype and sex on the risk for lung cancer (SCCS: P=.03; MDA: P=.03; Pooled: P=.003) with a greater effect in men. Additional analyses are underway to explore potential contributing factors to the observed interaction. Genetic variation in CYP2A6 contributes to lung cancer risk among African American smokers, whereby CYP2A6 genotypes associated with reduced metabolic activity confer a lower risk of developing lung cancer. Citation Format: Catherine A. Wassenaar, Yuanqing Ye, Qiuyin Cai, Melinda Aldrich, Joanne Knight, Margaret R. Spitz, Xifeng Wu, William J. Blot, Rachel F. Tyndale. Genetic variation in CYP2A6, a nicotine/nitrosamine metabolism enzyme, influences lung cancer risk in two independent case-control studies of African American smokers. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 105th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2014 Apr 5-9; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2014;74(19 Suppl):Abstract nr 4149. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2014-4149

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.688
Threshold uncertainty score0.968

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.377
Teacher spread0.351 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer ResearchSame topicGlutathione Transferases and PolymorphismsFrench-language works237,207