Dynamics of Resettlement of the Population in the Area of the Semirechensk Territory in the Beginning of XIX – XX Century
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The aim of this article is to reveal the stages of migration movement of Russian peasants in Turkestan,particularlyto the area of Semirechensk from the European Russia: from the West Siberian provinces, Tomsk,Tobolsk, Akmola, Semipalatinsk and other regions. The article reveals the activities of the government and theState Council of Russia on the organization of resettlement within the Semirechensk region: reorganization andassociation of the Resettlement Department to the General Administration of Lands and Agriculture, the creationof a special party for the formation of temporary resettlement sites in the Semirechensk area; causes for registerthe resettlement sites. It is pointed out that since the beginning of the XX century, the huge rate of migration hasbeen observed in the Semirechie, so by the end of 1911,15,963 immigrant families have arrived here, for a totalof about 100,000 persons of both sexes. The data are provided on how many land sites have been prepared forthe immigrated peasants, of which square they were, the quantity of land sites per capita, information about theeducated Russian settlements and settlers in the Semirechie in the beginning of XX century, according to theannual report data of the military governors in the Semirechensk region from 1906 to 1915. It is concluded thatafter the October Revolution, the new Soviet government did not pay much attention to the Russian peasants,and in this area the old colonial policy would have been continued.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".