MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1562188241 · doi:10.1002/asjc.1151

State Estimation of Stochastic Impulsive System Via Stochastic Adaptive Impulsive Observer

2015· article· en· W1562188241 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueAsian Journal of Control · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdaptive Control of Nonlinear Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsObserver (physics)Control theory (sociology)Nonlinear systemParametric statisticsState (computer science)State observerMathematicsStochastic processEstimationComputer scienceEngineeringControl (management)AlgorithmStatisticsArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract This paper develops stochastic adaptive impulsive observer (SAIO) for state estimation of stochastic impulsive systems. Proposed observer is applicable to linear and a class of nonlinear stochastic impulsive systems. In addition to stochastic noises, the observer considers effect of parametric uncertainty and estimates unknown parameters by suitable adaptation laws. Interestingly, for certain impulsive systems, SAIO gives continuous state estimations from a discrete sequence of system output measurements. New theorems related to stochastic impulsive systems' boundedness are also developed and utilized to prove the boundedness of SAIO state estimation errors. Presented simulation results illustrate the effectiveness of the observer.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.974
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it