MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1562218002

Pierre Pastré, Yves Lenoir (dir.), Didactique professionnelle et didactiques des disciplines en débat. Toulouse : éd. Octarès, 320 p.

2008· article· fr· W1562218002 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Philippe Astier

Bibliographic record

VenueRecherche & formation · 2008
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducation, sociology, and vocational training
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesSociologyPhilosophy
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cet ouvrage publie quelques contributions d’une rencontre de chercheurs francophones (Europe et Quebec principalement). Il invite a trois niveaux de lecture, independants ou relies, portant chacun une interrogation centrale : qu’est-ce qu’apprendre un metier ? qu’en est-il quand ce metier est celui d’enseignant ? qu’en est-il quand l’enseignement a pour objet un apprentissage professionnel ? Sur ces questions, le « debat » porte d’abord sur l’affirmation de la specificite de chaque approche :...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.040
Threshold uncertainty score0.080

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.004
Science and technology studies0.0030.003
Scholarly communication0.0050.009
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0030.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0190.014

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.482
GPT teacher head0.514
Teacher spread0.032 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRecherche & formationSame topicEducation, sociology, and vocational trainingFrench-language works237,207