MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1562325188

Unsupervised cardiac PET image segmentation

2011· article· en· W1562325188 on OpenAlexaffabout
Renato Dedić, Madjid Állili, Roger Lecomte

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Conference on Systems, Signals and Image Processing · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMedical Imaging Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsBishop's UniversityUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtificial intelligenceSegmentationComputer visionThresholdingComputer scienceImage segmentationRegion of interestActive contour modelCluster analysisPattern recognition (psychology)VentricleImage (mathematics)Medicine
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Automatic, unsupervised image segmentation plays an important role in medical imaging, but remains a challenging task in positron emission tomography (PET) due to unpredictable object shapes and inconsistent image quality resulting from noise and sampling artifacts. The main objective of this work is to develop a segmentation method for the mouse myocardium PET images based on deformable models. Two moving curves, one from inside of the left ventricle and one from the outside of the heart will be deformed to track heart boundaries. More precisely, topology constraints are incorporated to the energy functional governing the evolution of the contours to avoid any collision while allowing them to compete against each other until stabilization. First, we locate the heart, which is the region of interest (ROI) for our study, using level sets with high internal energy initialized from the extremities of the image. It is followed by an optimal thresholding and the application of the mean shift clustering algorithm to locate the center of the left ventricle region. This is where a second contour (interior contour) is initialized. The coupled contours allow to detect the correct myocardial boundaries and compute a number of useful quantities such as the ejection-fraction of the left ventricle and the myocardium wall thickness. The model was applied successfully to the automatic segmentation of the PET images of a mouse myocardium as measured by the Sherbrooke LabPET scanner.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.086
GPT teacher head0.355
Teacher spread0.269 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2011
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Conference on Systems, Signals and Image ProcessingSame topicMedical Imaging Techniques and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207