MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1562521403 · doi:10.1080/23120053.2015.1103958

Tuberculosis and blood-borne infectious diseases: workplace conditions and practices of healthcare workers at three public hospitals in the Free State

2015· article· en· W1562521403 on OpenAlexaff
Michelle Engelbrecht, André Janse van Rensburg, Asta Rau, Annalee Yassi, Jerry Spiegel, Lyndsay M. O’Hara, Elizabeth Bryce, Lucky Nophale

Bibliographic record

VenueSouthern African Journal of Infectious Diseases · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicInfection Control in Healthcare
Canadian institutionsVancouver Coastal HealthUniversity of British Columbia
FundersUniversiteit van die Vrystaat
KeywordsMedicineRespiratorTuberculosisInfection controlAuditPublic healthEnvironmental healthHygienePersonal protective equipmentHealth careMedical emergencyFamily medicineEmergency medicineInfectious disease (medical specialty)Intensive care medicineNursingCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)Internal medicineDiseasePathologyBusiness

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

AbstractHealthcare workers (HCWs) have increased risks due to continued exposure to patients with infectious diseases, particularly tuberculosis and hepatitis B. This study assessed workplace conditions and practices regarding air- and blood-borne infections in public hospitals in the Free State. Workplace audits were conducted in intensive care, medical wards and casualty departments at three Free State public hospitals. A questionnaire survey was also administered to a targeted 20% stratified quota sample at these facilities. Of the 513 HCWs surveyed, 21.2% reported needle-stick injuries and other body fluid exposure and 19.1% were not adequately protected against hepatitis B. Additionally, 68.3% were never screened for tuberculosis, 54.8% did not wear N95® respirators when needed, only 28.5% washed their gloves and 19.8% did not always wash their hands between caring for different patients. Physicians were at highest risk of needle-stick injuries, were less compliant with hand hygiene, and associated with lower rates of tuberculosis screening, reporting spills and wearing N95® respirators. A significant association was also found between training and screening for tuberculosis, and the use of N95® respirators. The workplace audits highlighted infection control hazards, including the improper use of N95® respirators, a lack of available soap and inadequate availability of sharps containers. There is an urgent need to protect HCWs from workplace hazards. Considerable attention is needed to improve infection control practices by HCWs, and especially physicians. Guidelines and legal frameworks exist. It is time to implement the needed measures."My experience in getting tuberculosis was horrible, and I know other doctors who have had it much worse (full-blown multidrug-resistant tuberculosis). The system has to do much more to protect us if there are going to be people to provide health care in this country." – Young doctor with rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis, Free State (February 2013)Keywords: tuberculosisblood-borne infectious diseasesinfection control

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.033
Threshold uncertainty score0.936

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.303
Teacher spread0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations24
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSouthern African Journal of Infectious DiseasesSame topicInfection Control in HealthcareFrench-language works237,207