Takings International: A Comparative Perspective on Land Use Regulations and Compensation Rights
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Regulatory takings and the role of comparative research / Rachelle Alterman -- Comparative analysis : a platform for cross-national learning / Rachelle Alterman -- Conclusions : the U.S. property rights debate viewed through cross-national lenses / Rachelle Alterman -- Canada / Bryan P. Schwartz and Melanie R. Bueckert -- Australia / John Sheehan -- United Kingdom / Michael Purdue -- France / Vincent A. Renard -- Greece / Georgia Giannakourou and Evangelia Balla -- Finland / Katri Nuuja and Kauko Viitanen -- Austria / Karin Hiltgartner -- United States / Thomas E. Roberts -- The special case of Oregon : the heated debates regarding Measures 37 and 49 / Bianca Putters -- Poland / Miroslaw Gdesz -- The Federal Republic of Germany / Gerd Schmidt-Eichstaedt -- Sweden / Thomas Kalbro-- Israel / Rachelle Alterman -- The Netherlands / Fred Hobma.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it