MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1562583791 · doi:10.1109/sips.2003.1235693

Efficient direct 2D architecture for lifted biorthogonal DWT

2004· article· en· W1562583791 on OpenAlexaff
Mehboob Alam, Wael Badawy, Vassil S. Dimitrov, G.A. Jullien

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicImage and Signal Denoising Methods
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiorthogonal systemComputer scienceParallel computingSignal processingWaveletDiscrete wavelet transformLifting schemeBiorthogonal waveletTransposeSecond-generation wavelet transformAlgorithmArchitectureWavelet transformDigital signal processingComputer hardwareArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The paper presents a new algorithm for 2D nonseparable lifted biorthogonal wavelet transform. The algorithm is derived by factoring complementary pairs of wavelet transform filters written as (L/spl times/M) tap 2D filters. The results are efficient architectures for real time signal processing, which do not require transpose memory for 2D processing of data. The proposed architecture exploits the in-place implementation inherited from the algorithm and can take advantage of both vertical and horizontal parallelism in the direct implementation. Processing in the architecture is scheduled carefully by pipelining the lifted steps, which allows two or four times faster processing than the direct implementation. The architecture therefore allows lowering of the clock frequency by two/four. The proposed architecture operates at high speed, consumes low power and has reduced computational complexity as compared to already published filter and lifting-based biorthogonal wavelet architectures.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicImage and Signal Denoising MethodsFrench-language works237,207