Valence change and magnetic order in YbMn<sub>6</sub>Ge<sub>6 −<i>x</i></sub>Sn<sub><i>x</i></sub>
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The YbMn(6)Ge(6-x)Sn(x) compounds (0 < x < 6) have been investigated using x-ray diffraction, magnetic measurements, neutron diffraction and (170)Yb Mössbauer spectroscopy. The YbMn(6)Ge(6-x)Sn(x) system comprises three solid solutions: (i) 0 < x ≤ 1.1, (ii) 3.2 ≤ x ≤ 4.6 and (iii) 5.3 ≤ x < 6, all of which crystallize in the hexagonal (P6/mmm) HfFe(6)Ge(6)-type structure. The substitution of Sn for Ge yields changes in the type of magnetic order (antiferromagnetic, helimagnetic, ferromagnetic, conical and ferrimagnetic), in the easy magnetization direction (from easy axis to easy plane) as well as in the valence state of Yb (from trivalent to divalent). The Mn moments order at or above room temperature, while magnetic ordering of the Yb sublattice is observed at temperatures up to 110 K. While Yb is trivalent for x ≤ 1.1 and divalent for x ≥ 5.3, both magnetic and (170)Yb Mössbauer spectroscopy data suggest that there is a gradual reduction in the average ytterbium valence through the intermediate solid solution (3.2 ≤ x ≤ 4.6), and that intermediate valence Yb orders magnetically, a very unusual phenomenon. Analysis of the (170)Yb Mössbauer spectroscopy data suggests that the departure from trivalency starts as early as x = 3.2 and the loss of ytterbium moment is estimated to occur at an average valence of ∼2.5+.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it