Bibliographic record
Abstract
tente ici de faire valoir le point de vue selon lequel il demeure pertinent, contrairement à ce que la rectitude politique me semble vouloir prêcher, de s’interroger sur les possibles différences entre les hommes et les femmes en ce qui a trait aux aspects de la dynamique psychique que la problématique pédagogique interpelle. Je fais d’abord remarquer que je n’ai pu trouver aucune « théorie scientifique » s’y rapportant dans les sciences humaines prétendant s’y intéresser. Je propose ensuite une amorce de traitement théorique de la problématique, que je pousse jusqu’à l’opérationnalisation, puis à un premier test empirique, qui m’apparaît concluant quant à l’intérêt de poursuivre la lancée. En conclusion, je lance quelques pistes de réflexions sur les implications de ma théorie relatives à la pratique pédagogique.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".