MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1562803170 · doi:10.26522/tl.v7i3.400

Expanding Educators’ Awareness of Youth Homelessness through Critical Dramatic Inquiry

2013· article· en· W1562803170 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.

Bibliographic record

VenueTeaching and Learning · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicTheatre and Performance Studies
Canadian institutionsBrock UniversityUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDramaSocial justiceCitizen journalismPovertyPedagogySociologyEquity (law)Critical pedagogyPsychologyPolitical scienceSocial scienceLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article explores how educators use drama in conjunction with critical inquiry to support students’ sustained notions of equity and engagement. After participating in a Mantle of the Expert (Heathcote & Bolton, 1995) — a participatory, drama in education inquiry — eleven educators enrolled in a university drama course gained a broader awareness of poverty, enabling them to refute stereotypes of homeless youth. Findings demonstrate that critical dramatic inquiry has the potential to bridge cultural divisions and increase group awareness of social justice initiatives. Additionally, for many of the participants the Mantle opened their eyes to a new pedagogy — a method and practice of teaching that was both critical and participatory.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.025
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.057
GPT teacher head0.314
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it