Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article compare la colonisation des terres marécageuses en Acadie et en France au cours du 17e siècle. Il s’ouvre sur une analyse des raisons pour lesquelles les premières tentatives en vue de coloniser les marais échouèrent. Il compare ensuite les tentatives fructueuses effectuées plus tard à Port-Royal, en Acadie, et dans le Marais poitevin, en France. Malgré les objectifs bien différents qu’ils poursuivaient et les défis différents posés par l’environnement, les deux groupes organisèrent leurs activités avec efficacité et firent preuve d’innovation en adaptant de vieilles techniques. Ce qui fit la particularité de la culture des marais en Acadie, c’est sa petite échelle et son caractère dispersé et décentralisé. Les deux initiatives démontrent comment la colonisation des terres marécageuses était une entreprise profondément locale.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".