New Developments for Physically-based Falling Snow Retrievals over Land in Preparation for GPM
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The NASA Global Precipitation Measurement mission (GPM) concept centers on deploying a Core spacecraft carrying a dual-frequency precipitation radar and a microwave radiometric imager with channels from 10 to 183 GHz to serve as a precipitation physics observatory and a calibration reference to unify a constellation of dedicated and operational passive microwave sensors. Because of the extended orbit of the Core (plus or minus 65 deg) and the enhanced dual frequency radar and high frequency radiometer, GPM will be able to sense falling snow precipitation and light rain over land. Accordingly, GPM has partnered with the Canadian CloudSat/CALIPSO Validation Project (C3VP) to obtain observations to provide one of several important ground-based validation data sets around which the falling snow models and retrieval algorithms can be further developed and tested. In this work we compare and correlate the long time series (Nov.'06 - March '07) measurements of precipitation rate from parsivels to the passive (89, 150, 183 plus or minus 1, plus or minus 3, plus or minus 7 GHz) observations of NOAA's AMSU-B radiometer. We separate the comparisons into categories of no precipitation, liquid rain and falling snow precipitation. We found that there are similar TBs (especially at 89 and 150 GHz) for cases with falling snow and for non-precipitating cases. The comparisons indicate that surface emissivity contributions to the satellite observed TB over land can add uncertainty in detecting and estimating falling snow. The newest results show that by computing brightness temperatures based on CARE radiosonde data and a rough estimate of surface emissivity show that the cloud ice scattering signal in the AMSU-B data is detected. That is the differences in computed TB and AMSU-B TB for precipitating and non-precipitating cases are unique such that the precipitating and non-precipitating cases can be identified. These results require that the radiosonde releases are within an hour of the AMSU-B data. Forest fraction, snow cover, and measured emissivities were combined to calculate the surface emissivities.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".