MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1563014333

Feminist Activism Around the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict

2003· article· en· W1563014333 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Sharon Groves

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian women's studies · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicJewish and Middle Eastern Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsShalomMainstreamSolidarityGender studiesHuman rightsSociologyDeclarationPeace movementLawPolitical sciencePoliticsTheology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

What follows are three reports by Terry Greenblatt, director of Israeli feminist peace organization, Bat Shalom; Arnneh Badran, acting director of Jerusalem Center for Women; and Penny Rosenwasser, Jewish American peace activist and recent participant in International Solidarity Movement's Freedom Summer Campaign. Although these women reside in different locations, all share a deep commitment to ending occupation, advocating for rights ofpalestinians, widelypublicizing human rights abuses, and furthering an inclusive dialogue for peace. This is truly remarkable work, given on-going escalation of violence inflicted daily on innocent people in region. What these women understand, but what media has failed to report (especially mainstream press in U.S.), is that women's groups are leading way-some might argue inventing way-for discussions ofpeace. As Terry Greenblatt points out, April 2002 joint declaration from Bat Shalom and Jerusalem Center for Women was the first joint anything in almost two years. Despite their courageous breakthrough, only women's and feminist magazines, journals, ande-mail publications have reported on such peace initiatives. Perhaps these reports will leave you feeling hopeful, as they did me, that important contributions feminist activists are making to peace under most dire conditions can be effective even in these seemingly hopeless times.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.123
Threshold uncertainty score0.244

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0260.012
Scholarly communication0.0060.002
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.053
GPT teacher head0.300
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian women's studiesSame topicJewish and Middle Eastern StudiesFrench-language works237,207