MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1563231667 · doi:10.3917/geoec.075.0177

Accompagner le renouveau économique et social du Mali en développant des filières originales : le cas du coton équitable

2015· article· fr· W1563231667 on OpenAlexaff
Christophe Estay, Omar Thiam

Bibliographic record

VenueGéoéconomie/Géoéconomie · 2015
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicAgriculture and Rural Development Research
Canadian institutionsFrancophone University Association
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

En 2012, le Mali a connu une crise politique grave, remettant en cause les avancées démocratiques et les efforts de développement. Le pays est dans une période transitoire indécise depuis le coup de force du 22 mars 2012. Le retour à l’ordre constitutionnel a été consacré par un accord-cadre signé entre le Capitaine Sanogo et la CEDEAO. Cet accord a porté le président de l’Assemblée nationale (2007- 2012), Traoré, à la tête du gouvernement de transition pour l’élaboration et la mise en œuvre de la feuille de route du processus de pacification. Ce processus a abouti à l’élection de Keita à la présidence en septembre 2013. Au sortir de la crise et malgré les menaces au nord du pays, une analyse structurelle de l’économie malienne est nécessaire afin de mieux identifier les caractéristiques essentielles au développement de ce pays. Les bases d’un renouveau de l’économie malienne peuvent alors être esquissées, conjuguant des préconisations issues d’études sur le développement, complétées par une approche de la spécialisation par filières, avec l’exemple du coton équitable.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.177
Threshold uncertainty score0.352

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0070.004
Scholarly communication0.0050.002
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0130.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.052
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGéoéconomie/GéoéconomieSame topicAgriculture and Rural Development ResearchFrench-language works237,207