Bibliographic record
Abstract
Les tristement celebres Donnelly ont emigre d'Irlande dans les annees 1840 dans l'espoir de connaitre la reussite dans ce pays qui devait un jour devenir le Canada. Pourtant, en 1880, la ferme des Donnelly est completement detruite par un incendie. Les corps de James, de sa bien-aimee Johannah, de leur fils Tom et de leur niece Bridget sont retrouves dans les cendres, apres le passage d'une bande de brutes. Un autre fils est retrouve mort, lui aussi victime de meurtre la meme nuit. A ce jour, malgre un grand nombre de preuves (incluant un temoin oculaire), personne n'a ete declare coupable. Plusieurs personnes etaient certaines de l'identite de « ceux qui l'avaient fait », mais deux proces se sont termines sans verdict de culpabilite. Est-ce qu'il s'agissait d'une communaute qui a decide de se faire justice elle-meme alors que le systeme judiciaire ne le pouvait pas? Ou s'agissait-il d'un gang qui terrorisait l'Ontario rurale? Est-ce que les Donnelly meritaient leur sort? Pourquoi n'y a-t-il pas eu de justice pour les Donnelly?
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.035 | 0.021 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.007 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.007 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.019 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".