MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1563267976 · doi:10.5347/isonomia.v0i13.556

El derecho como técnica social de control y reforma

2021· article· es· W1563267976 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIsonomía - Revista de teoría y filosofía del derecho · 2021
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicComparative constitutional jurisprudence studies
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDerechoPolitical scienceHumanitiesPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Como ustedes acaban de oír, yo no soy abogado. ¿Qué derecho tengo entonces para hablar sobre el derecho? Bueno, en primer lugar, el derecho es cosa que atañe no solamente a los jurisconsultos, a los legisladores y a los abogados, sino algo que nos atañe a todos. En segundo lugar, el filósofo es un entrometido, se mete con cualquier cosa y en cualquier campo. Y en tercer lugar, a mí siempre me interesó la ley porque, no en vano, mi abuelo paterno fue Presidente de la Corte Suprema de Justicia de Argentina y mi padre fue Legislador durante veinte años, además de Presidente de la Comisión de Legislación del Trabajo de la Cámara de Diputados de Argentina.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.851
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0040.003
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.363
Teacher spread0.329 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it