Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article s’intéresse à l’évolution de la pensée du sociologue Karl Mannheim dans le contexte de l’effondrement de la république de Weimar et de l’émigration allemande des années 1930. Face à l’occasion perdue que représente la démocratie weimarienne, Mannheim tente d’élaborer un projet sociologique et philosophique original qui met en valeur une autre histoire possible de la démocratie. L’article se divise en deux parties. La première fait état de la pensée sociologique de Mannheim dans les années qui précèdent sa fuite en Angleterre (1929-1933) et qui se caractérise essentiellement par son idéal d’expérimentation philosophique. La deuxième partie montre que ce type de pensée expérimentale est à la base de son premier ouvrage post-weimarien intitulé Mensch und Gesellschaft im Zeitalter des Umbaus (1935), dans lequel il tente de repenser les fondements intellectuels d’une démocratie qui pourrait s’émanciper de la fatalité de l’histoire et décider par elle-même de son propre destin.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.012 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".