Starch to value added biochemicals
Bibliographic record
Abstract
An in‐depth review on the catalytic transformation of starch to a remarkable breadth of products is discussed. The physicochemical properties of starches from different varieties are reported to influence their functionality. However, the impact of such properties on the reaction parameters for the cost‐effective production of selective chemicals is largely unexplored. With the emergence of ionic liquids as the reaction media, water insoluble starch biopolymer can be easily dissolved and converted to reaction products simultaneously. Furthermore, microwave assisted chemical synthesis is known to enhance the reaction rates and optimize the resultant product selectivity. Physical and chemical modifications of starch also plays a vital role in the production of commodity chemicals. Recently, the potential routes to the production of biochemicals from biomass like glucaric acid, 5‐hydroxymethyl furfural, 2,5‐diformylfuran, 2,5‐furandicarboxylic acid, 2,5‐dimethylfuran, levulinic acid and sorbitol have been studied. Similar promising routes from inexpensive starches are analyzed in the review, as a function of the challenges associated to their chemical pathways and scalability.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.007 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".