MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1563583513 · doi:10.1109/cccrv.2004.1301488

Categorization and learning of pen motion using hidden Markov models

2004· article· en· W1563583513 on OpenAlexaff
David Tausky, Richard Mann

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSpeech Recognition and Synthesis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceHidden Markov modelArtificial intelligenceCategorizationCategorical variablePattern recognition (psychology)Motion (physics)SegmentationFeature extractionRepresentation (politics)Computer visionGestureSpeech recognitionMachine learning

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper we present a framework for the classification and segmentation of motion data. First, a representation of different two-dimensional motion categories is proposed. Secondly, a system to categorize and segment motion is presented based on hidden Markov models, commonly used in speech recognition. Input to the system consists of online pen stroke data which includes the x, y position and time of each point along the line. Using derived speed and direction information the system classifies and segments the input into particular categories of motion. The resulting categorical information may be then used to describe the scene, extrapolate events, or as a part of a gesture recognition system. Applications beyond pen-based input are discussed. This paper contributes to pen based motion recognition research in two ways. First, a classification is performed based on a continuous sequence of observations, rather then feature extraction. Secondly, pen motion is transformed into a translation and rotation invariant representation prior to classification.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.937
Threshold uncertainty score0.160

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSpeech Recognition and SynthesisFrench-language works237,207