MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1563733954 · doi:10.7202/044194ar

Chamanisme et politique dans l’Uaçá, Bas-Oyapock (Amapá, Brésil)

2010· article· fr· W1563733954 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Florent Kohler

Bibliographic record

VenueAnthropologie et Sociétés · 2010
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicAnthropological Studies and Insights
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Une épidémie de crises convulsives survenue dans le village galibi-marworno de Kumarumã (Terre indigène Uaçá) entre septembre et novembre 2007 met au jour les fragiles équilibres établis au long des quarante dernières années : recomposition religieuse et ethnique, alliances institutionnelles, transfert du centre économique du fleuve Cassiporé vers la ville d’Oiapoque. L’extrême défiance suscitée par les pajé (nom attribué localement aux chamans) et la crise politique qui s’ensuit semblent traduire une lecture des événements selon une grille ancienne, alors que les familles vivaient dispersées de crainte d’être frappées par les maladies attribuées à la « sorcellerie d’attaque » (assault sorcery) au cours de « guerres spirituelles ». Tandis que le métier de leader communautaire s’apparente toujours davantage à une profession nécessitant des compétences administratives, la reconfiguration des rapports interethniques réduit les pajé à n’être détenteurs que d’un pouvoir sans objet. C’est là l’occasion d’examiner l’évolution des rapports entre chamanisme et politique depuis le rattachement définitif du nord de l’Amapá au Brésil, en 1900.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.136
Threshold uncertainty score0.271

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0060.004
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.165
GPT teacher head0.542
Teacher spread0.377 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnthropologie et SociétésSame topicAnthropological Studies and InsightsFrench-language works237,207