La poésie humoristique : Rémi Tremblay et les relations amoureuses au XIXe siècle canadien
Bibliographic record
Abstract
L’étude du XIXe siècle littéraire canadien-français s’est traditionnellement effectuée sur des bases critiques presque entièrement tournées vers l’Hexagone. Avec, comme toile de fond, les théories sur la littérature de l’exiguïté de Bourdieu, Casanova, Dubois, Paré, Biron, etc., l’auteur se penche ici sur les chansons et poèmes d’un important journaliste et écrivain canadien-français et franco-américain du XIXe siècle, aujourd’hui oublié, Rémi Tremblay (1847-1926). Par l’examen de sa vision de la femme et des relations amoureuses, il fait ressortir le caractère primordial de cette poésie plus populaire pour les connaissances scientifiques, qui fait revivre des aspects de l’histoire que l’Histoire a trop souvent oubliés.AbstractThe study of nineteenth-century French-Canadian literature has traditionally been based on critical texts and philosophies almost wholly inspired by French theoretical works. Theories on littérature de l'exiguïté (literature of the margins) by Bourdieu, Casanova, Dubois, Paré, Biron and several others make up the scholarly background which the author relies on to focus on the songs and poems written by Rémi Tremblay (1847-1926), an important French-Canadian and Franco-American journalist of the nineteenth century, practically unknown today. By examining Tremblay's portrayal of women and of romantic relationships, the author brings to light the essential contribution to scientific knowledge of this popular poet, whose works serve to remind us of certain aspects of our history too often forgotten.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.018 | 0.019 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".