MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1564145211 · doi:10.7202/044995ar

Des destinées distinctes

2010· article· fr· W1564145211 on OpenAlexafffundvenue
Guillaume Teasdale

Bibliographic record

VenueRecherches amérindiennes au Québec · 2010
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis
Canadian institutionsYork University
FundersCollege of Engineering, Michigan State UniversityUniversity of OttawaMichigan State UniversityWayne State University
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cet article examine l’expansion de la présence française dans la région de la rivière Détroit de la fin du xviie siècle jusqu’à la guerre de 1812, avec une attention particulière aux décennies subséquentes à la fin du Régime français ainsi qu’au développement du peuplement de la Rivière-aux-Raisins. Il maintient que plusieurs dizaines de familles françaises ont occupé un nombre toujours plus grand de terres agricoles dans cette région et qu’ils y ont reproduit un mode d’organisation territoriale directement inspiré des seigneuries de la vallée du Saint-Laurent. Cet article soutient par ailleurs que cette organisation du territoire eut pour effet de limiter le nombre de mariages entre Français et Amérindiennes dans les différents peuplements qui formèrent la colonie française de la région de la rivière Détroit. Il propose donc d’offrir une nouvelle perspective sur les relations franco-amérindiennes dans cette région.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.744
Threshold uncertainty score0.509

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0090.004
Scholarly communication0.0040.003
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0150.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.079
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.189 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2010
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRecherches amérindiennes au QuébecSame topicHistorical Studies and Socio-cultural AnalysisFrench-language works237,207