MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1564207091

Lost and Found in the Türler Losses

2008· article· en· W1564207091 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueChicago Review · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicPoetry Analysis and Criticism
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPoetryMeaning (existential)IndirectionIntrospectionLiteraturePhilosophyReflexive pronounAestheticsArtLinguisticsComputer scienceEpistemology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Barbara Guest contended throughout her poetry with its ever-present disposition to fragment. For her friend Frank O'Hara, survival was a matter of poise sustained in incessant polylogue. The self holds itself up by a repartee that short-circuits introspection. For O'Hara, to become too conscious of a particular poem's ruses threatened enterprise, and he went to considerable lengths to distract himself from disabused knowledge that the sand inevitably seeks eye // and it is same eye. Guest's ruses are glimpse, indirection, tangent, arrangement-and prosodie inflections of connective air. This last ruse suggests song, and is intended to; but cadences of Guest's exploratory verse are intellectual as well as musical. Intellection is not exhausted by signification, and together Guest's ruses allow her to forestall both signification and she sometimes espouses. Signification alone might produce an off-text (a fully paraphrasable text) or a metatext (a text with tactical dabs of knowingness), both of which would reduce Guests redoubtable language-quiddity to a springboard for what would be consummated elsewhere. In other words, meaning would be produced after fact. But what matter for Guest are words as sounded. Mystery, on other hand, would be inherently contradictory. For to contrive mystery ends up with table-rapping-as biographer of H.D. well knew-or with self-conscious phrasemaking. In her finest poems, knowingness comes with linguistic territory: it is not contrived or concealed, not mapped-on or realized at poem's destination. This brief essay looks at Barbara Guest's revisions to The Tuner and shows her paring away at too-obtrusive, unincorporated metatext. For most part, her revisions are successful: she sharpens edges where blur and dissolution threaten. At some points, however, she appears to court enigma through abridgment, to settle on mystery, leaving linguistic outcrops exposed, high and dry. The sonic hum and buzz that shape ground of her poetry are more apparent in revised version because it refers less obviously to context of its composition. But Guest's discomfort with some autobiographical aspects of book seems also to have motivated cuts at its beginning and end whose effects are less successful. The comprises passages of a prose travelogue from Switzerland, drawn from Guest's visits to Zurich and to house H.D. shared with her lover Bryher; some whimsy around loss of two watches, which Guest associates with importunate and vanishing faces and surfaces; a response to paintings in both prose and verse; and a considerable amount of probably autobiographical material that tends to emerge in compressed lyrics. When Guest made a studio recording of excerpts from The in May 1984, text she used had been published as a chapbook in 1979 by Mansfield Book Mart in Montreal. This text differs significantly from text published in Fair Realism as Turler Losses in 1989 and reprinted in 1995 in her Selected Poems with definite article restored. Notably, final version of The Tuner loses four final poems (or poem sections) of original text, several brief narrative linkages, and two clearly metatextual passages. One or two changes may be printing errors, notably curious Less isn't so important (Fair Realism and Selected Poems) for Loss isn't so important: identical lineation of prose sections in these two later printings makes it plausible that an error might have been carried over. The first deleted metatextual passage perhaps too unambiguously defines book as biographical work or as its outgrowth: SEE: INDEX, CROSS-FILING, UNIVERSITY, CORRESPONDENCE ac-Va Yu, post, previous, subsequent, intervening, chronological, summary, additional material, foreign-native, biographical, birth, posthumous.. .NB All private papers withheld. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.851
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.077
GPT teacher head0.275
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it