MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W1564207091

Lost and Found in the Türler Losses

2008· article· en· W1564207091 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
John Wilkinson

Notice bibliographique

RevueChicago Review · 2008
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiquePoetry Analysis and Criticism
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésPoetryMeaning (existential)IndirectionIntrospectionLiteraturePhilosophyReflexive pronounAestheticsArtLinguisticsComputer scienceEpistemology
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Barbara Guest contended throughout her poetry with its ever-present disposition to fragment. For her friend Frank O'Hara, survival was a matter of poise sustained in incessant polylogue. The self holds itself up by a repartee that short-circuits introspection. For O'Hara, to become too conscious of a particular poem's ruses threatened enterprise, and he went to considerable lengths to distract himself from disabused knowledge that the sand inevitably seeks eye // and it is same eye. Guest's ruses are glimpse, indirection, tangent, arrangement-and prosodie inflections of connective air. This last ruse suggests song, and is intended to; but cadences of Guest's exploratory verse are intellectual as well as musical. Intellection is not exhausted by signification, and together Guest's ruses allow her to forestall both signification and she sometimes espouses. Signification alone might produce an off-text (a fully paraphrasable text) or a metatext (a text with tactical dabs of knowingness), both of which would reduce Guests redoubtable language-quiddity to a springboard for what would be consummated elsewhere. In other words, meaning would be produced after fact. But what matter for Guest are words as sounded. Mystery, on other hand, would be inherently contradictory. For to contrive mystery ends up with table-rapping-as biographer of H.D. well knew-or with self-conscious phrasemaking. In her finest poems, knowingness comes with linguistic territory: it is not contrived or concealed, not mapped-on or realized at poem's destination. This brief essay looks at Barbara Guest's revisions to The Tuner and shows her paring away at too-obtrusive, unincorporated metatext. For most part, her revisions are successful: she sharpens edges where blur and dissolution threaten. At some points, however, she appears to court enigma through abridgment, to settle on mystery, leaving linguistic outcrops exposed, high and dry. The sonic hum and buzz that shape ground of her poetry are more apparent in revised version because it refers less obviously to context of its composition. But Guest's discomfort with some autobiographical aspects of book seems also to have motivated cuts at its beginning and end whose effects are less successful. The comprises passages of a prose travelogue from Switzerland, drawn from Guest's visits to Zurich and to house H.D. shared with her lover Bryher; some whimsy around loss of two watches, which Guest associates with importunate and vanishing faces and surfaces; a response to paintings in both prose and verse; and a considerable amount of probably autobiographical material that tends to emerge in compressed lyrics. When Guest made a studio recording of excerpts from The in May 1984, text she used had been published as a chapbook in 1979 by Mansfield Book Mart in Montreal. This text differs significantly from text published in Fair Realism as Turler Losses in 1989 and reprinted in 1995 in her Selected Poems with definite article restored. Notably, final version of The Tuner loses four final poems (or poem sections) of original text, several brief narrative linkages, and two clearly metatextual passages. One or two changes may be printing errors, notably curious Less isn't so important (Fair Realism and Selected Poems) for Loss isn't so important: identical lineation of prose sections in these two later printings makes it plausible that an error might have been carried over. The first deleted metatextual passage perhaps too unambiguously defines book as biographical work or as its outgrowth: SEE: INDEX, CROSS-FILING, UNIVERSITY, CORRESPONDENCE ac-Va Yu, post, previous, subsequent, intervening, chronological, summary, additional material, foreign-native, biographical, birth, posthumous.. .NB All private papers withheld. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,067
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,223

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,003
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0120,007
Communication savante0,0090,005
Science ouverte0,0010,007
Intégrité de la recherche0,0020,004
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0670,017

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,077
Tête enseignante GPT0,275
Écart entre enseignants0,198 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2008
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueChicago ReviewMême sujetPoetry Analysis and CriticismTravaux en français237 207