MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1564350084 · doi:10.1002/9781444323351.ch21

Functional Foods and Bone Health: Where are we at?

2010· other· en· W1564350084 on OpenAlexaff
Wendy E. Ward, Beatrice Y.Y. Lau, Jovana Kaludjerovic, Sandra M. Sacco

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typeother
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPhytoestrogen effects and research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolyunsaturated fatty acidBone healthOsteoporosisSOY ISOFLAVONESBone remodelingFood scienceHealth benefitsLong chainFish boneFish <Actinopterygii>ChemistryIsoflavonesBone mineralBiologyBiochemistryMedicineFatty acidEndocrinologyTraditional medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This chapter contains sections titled: Osteoporosis is a significant public health issue Bone is a dynamic tissue throughout the life cycle Assessment of bone health Foods and dietary components that may modulate bone metabolism throughout the life cycle Soy and its isoflavones Fish oil and n-3 long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids Flaxseed and its components, secoisolariciresinol diglycoside and α-linolenic acid Summary – Where are we at? Where do we go from here? References

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.073
Threshold uncertainty score0.245

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0730.019

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.334
Teacher spread0.295 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPhytoestrogen effects and researchFrench-language works237,207