MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1564374350 · doi:10.1116/1.1463082

Fabrication of Gd2O2S:Tb based phosphor films coupled with photodetectors for x-ray imaging applications

2002· article· en· W1564374350 on OpenAlexaff
Zhenyu Gu, Arokia Nathan

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Vacuum Science & Technology A Vacuum Surfaces and Films · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicLuminescence Properties of Advanced Materials
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhosphorMaterials sciencePhotodetectorOptoelectronicsPolyvinyl alcoholFabricationOpticsComposite materialPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Gd2O2S:Tb based phosphor coupled with photodetectors has been widely used in digital x-ray imaging applications. The key issues associated with phosphor film are x-ray absorption and conversion efficiency, spatial resolution, deposition uniformity, and integration with the imaging array. In this article we report on experimental studies of the phosphor film synthesis, deposition, and characterization. A composite material, consisting of Gd2O2S:Tb, polyvinyl alcohol, and water coupled with a small amount of additives, is synthesized as a phosphor paste. The parameters controlling film quality include individual component concentrations, grain sizes of phosphor, and viscosity of the solution. A sedimentation technique is used to deposit the phosphor directly on the imaging array. A number of phosphor films have been synthesized with the particle sizes ranging from 2.5 to 25 μm and film thickness ranging from 85 to 1100 μm, and measurement results of x-ray conversion efficiency and spatial resolution in terms of modulation transfer function are presented. A new technology for phosphor patterning is proposed to seamlessly integrate the phosphor with the photodetectors by using negative photoresist SU-8 and preliminary results are presented.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.065
Threshold uncertainty score0.758

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Vacuum Science & Technology A Vacuum Surfaces and FilmsSame topicLuminescence Properties of Advanced MaterialsFrench-language works237,207