MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1564543326

Modeling electrostatic field in mems devices using artdticial springs in rayleigh-ritz method

2009· article· en· W1564543326 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Avinash K. Bhaskar, Muthukumaran Packirisamy, Rama Bhat

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian acoustics · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced MEMS and NEMS Technologies
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStiffnessBoundary value problemVibrationStructural engineeringMicroelectromechanical systemsLegendre polynomialsOrthogonal polynomialsClassical mechanicsMathematical analysisMechanicsEngineeringMaterials scienceMathematicsPhysicsAcoustics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Boundary characteristic orthogonal polynomials were used in the Rayleigh-Ritz method to model and analyze electrostatic field in micro electro mechanical system (MEMS) devices. These orthogonal polynomials were generated using Gram-Schmidt process to conduct the investigations. The vibration problem was formulated at the static equilibrium condition by including an elastic foundation stiffness to represent the electrostatic field effects. The problem was formulated to obtain the modeshapes and the eigenvalues of the plate type microdevice at the static equilibrium position. The electrostatic field had a softening effect on the elastic property of the system, as it acted in opposition to the structural stiffness. The softening effect was introduced in terms of distributed springs or an elastic foundation with stiffness per unit area of 'Ke' to apply the boundary conditioning to represent the electrostatic effect.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.149
Threshold uncertainty score0.994

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian acousticsSame topicAdvanced MEMS and NEMS TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207